About EvaliX
EvaliX runs the full assessment cycle with AI working at eight distinct points. Arabic in its design rather than its interface, hosted in-Kingdom by default, and it measures the quality of your items as rigorously as the performance of your students — then closes the quality loop with an action whose effect is measured. Imported systems do not do this. Neither do dashboards.
From authoring an item to accreditation evidence, in one system rather than scattered tools.
Generation, rubrics, scoring, proctoring, adaptivity, prediction, quality reports and summaries.
Universities, training providers, schools and licensing bodies — each with its own path.
Databases and proctoring media, by default rather than as a paid upgrade.
Not general claims but specific capabilities, every one of them demonstrable on your own data today.
Imported systems translate the interface and leave data tables left-to-right and certificates with disconnected glyphs. In EvaliX direction, typography and the document engine are built on Arabic from the ground up, and the item editor handles Arabic prose, equations and code in a single block. That difference shows on the first certificate you print, not in the slide deck.
It generates items from a course file or pasted text at a set difficulty and outcome, builds scoring rubrics, marks essays against them, proctors and detects collusion, drives adaptive delivery, predicts who is falling behind, and writes the quality report with strengths and areas for improvement. Eight working points, every one of them demonstrable today.
Most systems give you the score. We give you the score and tell you whether the item that produced it was sound. Facility and discrimination are computed per item from live responses, unwell items are surfaced before they affect a decision, and a corrected key rescores the entire cohort in one reliable transaction.
Every analytics platform ends at a number. EvaliX completes the path: a finding carries an action with a named owner and a date, and the same metric is recomputed automatically next cycle so the effect is classified. This is precisely what an external reviewer asks about — and it exists in no other assessment platform on the market today.
From a teacher preparing the weekly quiz, to a dean building the accreditation file, to a licensing body protecting its bank from leakage — the same system, configured differently.
Mathematics, chemistry, engineering and code: equations, symbols and an on-screen keypad, coding items that actually execute, and generated values that differ per student.
A private bank per instructor and a shared institutional bank with permissions, an approval cycle and preserved versions.
Relational mapping to course and programme outcomes, automatic inheritance of Bloom's level and domain, and attainment reports exported with threshold and method documented.
Continuous identity verification, AI proctoring and item exposure control — each layer enabled independently to match the stakes.
Administrator, instructor and student — each with its own screen, permissions and reports.
A public verification code letting an employer confirm a credential in seconds without contacting you.
We ask institutions to prove their method, so we publish ours: eight reference articles, a 154-term measurement glossary, and free working templates — open to review and quotation.
From psychometrics to closing the quality loop — written to be read, not skimmed.
Read the blog 154 termsA rare Arabic–English reference in this field, applied across product and content alike.
Open the glossary TemplatesThe assessment blueprint and the accreditation evidence checklist — no form, no sign-up.
Get the templatesWe do not present slides. We take a real course from your institution and run it in front of you: generate the items, deliver the assessment, and show the item analysis and attainment report — in a single session.
