Item generation from your content
Upload a course file or paste text, set difficulty and outcome — items are generated already linked to that outcome and land in drafts for review.
A Saudi assessment platform
From the item bank to a verifiable certificate — Arabic-first, hosted in-Kingdom, with reports ready for the accreditation file.
Finals day tests the platform, not the student. Every interaction is persisted instantly; if the network drops, answers continue locally and reconcile when it returns; and a session resumes on another device from the exact second it stopped.
Offline-first · session recovery · single-device enforcement
An item that strong students get wrong more often than weak ones is not hard — it is broken. The platform computes facility and discrimination for every item from real responses and surfaces the unwell ones before they affect a decision.
Automatic item analysis · distractor analysis · atomic cohort rescoring
Every item is linked to a learning outcome at authoring time, inheriting its Bloom's level and domain automatically. The attainment report exports in one click, documented with its threshold, method and framework version — not assembled by hand weeks before a visit.
PLO → CLO → item → response · export ready for the accreditation file
Not a banner on a homepage but six capabilities working inside the assessment cycle — each with a stated boundary that keeps the final decision human.
Upload a course file or paste text, set difficulty and outcome — items are generated already linked to that outcome and land in drafts for review.
Proposed criteria and performance levels for essay items, edited by the instructor before approval.
Evaluation against the approved rubric with a proposed score and per-criterion reasoning — approval stays human.
Continuous facial matching, multiple faces and gaze deviation, and detection of identical answer patterns.
Strengths and areas for improvement per course, articulated from attainment and item analysis data.
Higher precision with fewer items, and flagging a student at risk while intervention is possible.
AI proposes, analyses and prioritises review. Integrity verdicts and final grades remain human decisions attributed to a person in the audit trail. Read the boundaries in full
Global platforms support Arabic by translating the interface, leave data tables left-to-right and certificates with disconnected glyphs, and host your data abroad.
Outcome structures and learning domains follow the adopted course-specification templates, and are configurable when the framework changes.
Databases and proctoring media are hosted locally by default, not as a paid upgrade.
Full layout mirroring, Arabic fonts embedded in certificate and report generation, and an editor that handles Arabic prose alongside code.
Eight reference articles and a 154-term glossary — published to be scrutinised, not believed.
With one scope that works well, not an institution-wide project that takes a year.
We take one real course or programme of yours and walk it in front of you — not a canned deck.
One course or one training track, with an approved outcome-mapped bank, in weeks rather than terms.
After the first assessment you hold real numbers on your own item quality — the best basis for a decision to expand.
We take a real course or training track and walk it from the item bank to the attainment report and item analysis — live, in front of you.